When I was using Geant4 V11.2.2, the following information appeared when running the program. However, such a problem did not occur in Geant4 v11.2.1 and v11.0.3. I suspect that it was caused by the code changes of the newly added model in v11.2.2. But how to solve it?
NeutronHP: /Capture file for Z = 18, A = 36 is not found and NeutronHP will use /home/esword/.local/software/geant4/11.2.2/share/Geant4/data/G4NDL4.7.1/Capture/CrossSection/18_37_Argon
NeutronHP: /Elastic file for Z = 18, A = 36 is not found and NeutronHP will use /home/esword/.local/software/geant4/11.2.2/share/Geant4/data/G4NDL4.7.1/Elastic/CrossSection/18_37_Argon
NeutronHP: /Inelastic file for Z = 18, A = 36 is not found and NeutronHP will use /home/esword/.local/software/geant4/11.2.2/share/Geant4/data/G4NDL4.7.1/Inelastic/CrossSection/18_37_Argon
NeutronHP: /Capture file for Z = 18, A = 38 is not found and NeutronHP will use /home/esword/.local/software/geant4/11.2.2/share/Geant4/data/G4NDL4.7.1/Capture/CrossSection/18_39_Argon
NeutronHP: /Elastic file for Z = 18, A = 38 is not found and NeutronHP will use /home/esword/.local/software/geant4/11.2.2/share/Geant4/data/G4NDL4.7.1/Elastic/CrossSection/18_39_Argon
NeutronHP: /Inelastic file for Z = 18, A = 38 is not found and NeutronHP will use /home/esword/.local/software/geant4/11.2.2/share/Geant4/data/G4NDL4.7.1/Inelastic/CrossSection/18_39_Argon
models/particle_hp:
o G4CrossSectionHP: …
Fixed elastic and capture cross-sections in Argon, by using only the main
isotope Z=18, A=40 (there was up to 50% overestimation of cross-sections
due to wrong data for rare isotopes of argon).
and
Data
----
+ G4NDL-4.7.1:
o Removed all files for Argon-36 and Argon-38 as significantly different
from those of ENDF/B-VIII.0.
Of course, if you have no argon in your simulation, then it makes no difference at all. If you have air in your geometry, elemental argon comprises only 0.934% of the gases in air and Ar-40 is 99.6 % of the elemental argon (Ar-36 is 0.334%, Ar-38 is 0.063%). So it will make a very small, likely negligible, difference.
If you have a pure natural or single isotope argon target, it will make a difference but I am unsure how much. The release notes suggest it will improve estimates, but the developers might want to jump in with a more quantitative answer.
I think @John_McFee gave already the answer, here it is the plots with the cross sections for argon. I think the original error happened in the data evaluation, and then propagated to Geant4.
I will open a bugzilla ticket regarding the error message.